{"id":9084,"date":"2022-02-25T12:15:05","date_gmt":"2022-02-25T09:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bestessayhomework.com\/tr\/?p=9084"},"modified":"2022-02-25T12:15:05","modified_gmt":"2022-02-25T09:15:05","slug":"siir-ve-gorsel-sanat-baglantisi-edebiyat-alaninda-tez-yaptirma-edebiyat-tez-yaptirma-ucretleri-edebiyat-odevleri-edebiyat-odev-ucretleri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bestessayhomework.com\/tr\/siir-ve-gorsel-sanat-baglantisi-edebiyat-alaninda-tez-yaptirma-edebiyat-tez-yaptirma-ucretleri-edebiyat-odevleri-edebiyat-odev-ucretleri\/","title":{"rendered":"\u015eiir ve G\u00f6rsel Sanat Ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131\u00a0 \u2013 Edebiyat Alan\u0131nda Tez Yapt\u0131rma \u2013 Edebiyat Tez Yapt\u0131rma \u00dccretleri \u2013 Edebiyat \u00d6devleri \u2013 Edebiyat \u00d6dev \u00dccretleri"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u015eiir ve G\u00f6rsel Sanat Ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 <\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u015eiir ve g\u00f6rsel sanat aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n ele al\u0131nmas\u0131, do\u011fal olarak d\u00f6nemselle\u015ftirme sorunlar\u0131na, farkl\u0131 disiplinlerin kronolojilerini uzla\u015ft\u0131rma sorunlar\u0131na yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130sko\u00e7 Chaucerians’\u0131 \u0130sko\u00e7 R\u00f6nesans \u015fairleri olarak yeniden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek, saf bir R\u00f6nesans evresini bulmay\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmad\u0131. \u0130ngiltere s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda, bu garip bir \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 da olduk\u00e7a zor oldu.<\/span><\/p>\n

R\u00f6nesans\u0131 kesinlikle \u0130sko\u00e7ya’n\u0131nkinden sonrayd\u0131 ve baz\u0131 ele\u015ftirmenler taraf\u0131ndan Spenser kadar ge\u00e7 kabul edildi. Di\u011ferleri onu tamamen ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131r. Ama en az\u0131ndan, Surrey’nin eskiden Wyatt’\u0131n \u015fiirleriyle gruplanan \u015fiirinin, yaln\u0131zca farkl\u0131 bir ku\u015fa\u011fa de\u011fil, farkl\u0131 bir \u00fcslup a\u015famas\u0131na da ait oldu\u011fu da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ve son y\u0131llarda Elizabeth d\u00f6nemi \u015fiirsel bi\u00e7imi, \u00f6z-bilin\u00e7li \u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6z referanslar\u0131 ve cesurlu\u011fu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tav\u0131rc\u0131 sanata benzer olarak takdir edilmeye ba\u015fland\u0131. Maniyerist \u00fcslubun belirli \u00f6zellikleri Fowler’\u0131n Conceitful Thought (1975) ve James V. Mirollo’nun Mannerism and Renaissance Poetry (1984); ancak bu do\u011frultuda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken \u00e7ok \u015fey var.<\/span><\/p>\n

R\u00f6nesans \u015fiirinin ele\u015ftirisinde izlenecek yollar nelerdir? Erken bir hedef, son zamanlarda Leicester Bradner (1940) ve JWBinns (1974) gibi yaln\u0131zca birka\u00e7 g\u00f6z\u00fcpek ka\u015fifin cesaret edebildi\u011fi neo-Latin \u015fiirinin art\u0131k neredeyse kimli\u011fi belirsiz olan topraklar\u0131n\u0131 yeniden a\u00e7mak olmal\u0131d\u0131r: Latin metinleraras\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bizim i\u00e7in \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemeye gerek yok. bu periyot. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, Frans\u0131zca ve \u0130talyanca kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara biraz dikkat edilirken, \u0130spanyolca ve Hollanda ba\u011flamlar\u0131 da fena halde ihmal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u0130hmal edilen t\u00fcrler aras\u0131nda, R\u00f8stvig’in The Happy Man’i, Kitty Secular’\u0131n Natural Magic’i (1965) ve Anthony Low’un The Georgic Revolution’\u0131 (1987) pek \u00e7ok sorgulama hatt\u0131 \u00f6nerdi\u011fi on yedinci y\u00fczy\u0131l georgic; ve Harold F.Brooks ve Raman Selden’in uzun zamand\u0131r beklenen Oldham bask\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n (1987) ve Keith Walker’\u0131n Rochester’\u0131n\u0131n (1984) yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n zaman\u0131nda bir te\u015fvik sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi taklit. Caroline’den Augustus \u015fiirine ge\u00e7i\u015f \u00e7ok daha fazla dikkat gerektiriyor: 1660’taki kurumsalla\u015fm\u0131\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcnme, y\u00fczy\u0131l ortas\u0131 \u015fiirinin incelenmesi \u00fczerinde bo\u011fucu bir etki yapt\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daha \u00f6nce ihmal edilen \u015fahsiyetler aras\u0131nda, \u015fiirleri en acil ele\u015ftiriye ihtiya\u00e7 duyan ki\u015fi, \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00e7e\u015fitlili\u011fi ve hatta tarihsel \u00f6nemi hala tan\u0131nmay\u0131 bekleyen Michael Drayton’dur. \u015eu anda, on alt\u0131nc\u0131 y\u00fczy\u0131l on yedinci y\u00fczy\u0131l kadar dikkat \u00e7ekiyor: \u00d6zellikle Yeni Tarihselciler, daha az bilinen d\u00f6nemde genellemeyi de daha kolay buluyorlar.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ama asl\u0131nda, bu yeni ilgi talihlidir, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc on alt\u0131nc\u0131 y\u00fczy\u0131lda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken hemen hemen her \u015fey kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Umut verici bir giri\u015f noktas\u0131, feminist ele\u015ftiri i\u00e7in ilgin\u00e7 bir konu sunan sonelerdir. Thomas Roche (1970, 1974) ve di\u011ferlerinin \u00f6nc\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, sone sekanslar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncede devrim yaratt\u0131: geriye, didaktik bir bi\u00e7im olarak sekans\u0131n yeni konseptini, bireysel \u015fairlerin ele\u015ftirisini ve daha geni\u015f t\u00fcr ve bireyselle\u015fme sorular\u0131na uygulamak da kal\u0131yor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u015eu anda, Patrick Grant’in Edebiyat\u0131 ve \u0130ngiliz R\u00f6nesans\u0131nda Y\u00f6ntem Ke\u015ffi (1985) gibi R\u00f6nesans psikolojisi ve mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve e\u011fitiminin bir\u00e7ok teorik analizi var. R\u00f6nesans \u015fiirinin ele\u015ftirisi \u00fczerinde yararl\u0131 bir etkiye sahip olup olmayacaklar\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6rece\u011fiz.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

G\u00f6rsel \u015fiir<\/a> \u00f6rnekleri<\/span>
\nSanat konulu \u015fiirler<\/span>
\nG\u00f6rsel \u015fiir nedir<\/span>
\nSanat ile ilgili \u015fiirler k\u0131sa<\/span>
\nSanat ile ilgili akrosti\u015f<\/span>
\nSanat ile ilgili \u015fiirler eodev<\/span>
\nSanat \u015fiiri iletisi<\/span>
\n\u015eiir<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

‘AUGUSTAN’ \u015e\u0130\u0130R\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/h4>\n

1660’da John Dryden, II. Charles’\u0131n restorasyonunu uzun, kutlamal\u0131, kahramanca bir \u015fiir olan Astraea Redux ile kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131; burada kral\u0131, i\u00e7 sava\u015f\u0131n \u0131zd\u0131rab\u0131ndan sonra eve bar\u0131\u015f\u0131 getiren ve yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015fanl\u0131 bir iktidar \u00e7a\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015flatan Augustus’a benzetiyor. ve evde geli\u015fen sanatlar. On yedinci y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n ba\u015flar\u0131nda James I, Ben Jonson ve Cromwell taraf\u0131ndan Edmund Waller taraf\u0131ndan benzer \u015fekilde \u00f6v\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcm. On sekizinci y\u00fczy\u0131l \u015fairleri de y\u00f6neticilerini Augustus’la kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131rlard\u0131, ama bunu ironik bir bi\u00e7imde, \u00e7o\u011fu kez de yapmazlard\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

On yedinci ve on sekizinci y\u00fczy\u0131lda \u0130ngiliz edebiyat\u0131n\u0131n “A\u011fustos \u00c7a\u011f\u0131”na yap\u0131lan g\u00f6ndermeler \u00e7ok azd\u0131r. En erken olan\u0131, 1690’da II. Charles’\u0131n saltanat\u0131na o d\u00f6nemde geli\u015fen \u015fairler sayesinde bu unvan\u0131 bah\u015feden Francis Atterbury’ye ait gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor; Bu at\u0131f, di\u011ferleri aras\u0131nda Jonathan Swift ve David Hume taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7eli\u015fiyordu, ancak hala on sekizinci y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n sonunda da yap\u0131l\u0131yordu.<\/span><\/p>\n

Oliver Goldsmith’in 1759’da yay\u0131nlanan \u0130ngiliz edebiyat\u0131n\u0131n “A\u011fustos” \u00e7a\u011f\u0131n\u0131n III. Bununla birlikte, yirminci y\u00fczy\u0131lda, “Augustan”, 1660 veya 1700’den 1800’e kadar olan edebiyat d\u00f6nemine olduk\u00e7a ayr\u0131m g\u00f6zetmeksizin uyguland\u0131. Bir zamanlar\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ele\u015ftirmeni George Saintsbury, The Peace of the Augustans: A Survey of the Augustans’ta bu terime otoritesini verdi. Dinlenme ve Yenilenme Yeri Olarak Onsekizinci Y\u00fczy\u0131l Edebiyat\u0131 (1915) ve Saintsbury’nin yatak arkada\u015f\u0131 olarak ne kadar tuhaf g\u00f6r\u00fcnse de, h\u00e2l\u00e2 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc olan ele\u015ftirmen FRLeavis yirmi y\u0131l sonra ona daha da fazla yetki verdi.<\/span><\/p>\n

Leavis, “August Gelene\u011fi” olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiirin “d\u00fczg\u00fcnl\u00fck ve d\u00fczyaz\u0131 uygunlu\u011fu” ile karakterize edildi\u011fini ya da en iyi ihtimalle “g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir gelenekselli\u011fe” y\u00fckseldi\u011fini g\u00f6rd\u00fc, ancak Alexander Pope’un \u00e7e\u015fitli ba\u015far\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcmseyici genellemelerinden ay\u0131rd\u0131. . \u0130kinci D\u00fcnya Sava\u015f\u0131’ndan sonra bu terim anketlerde ve arka plan kitaplar\u0131nda da yayg\u0131nla\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n

Daha yeni iki yorumcu, Pat Rogers (1974) ve Margaret Doody (1985), ‘Augustan’\u0131, tan\u0131nmay\u0131 te\u015fvik eden uygun bir stenografi par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak tutuyorlar, ancak her ikisi de kayda de\u011fer ele\u015ftirel enerjilerini, ortalamada uyand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 baz\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015f anlamalara kar\u015f\u0131 koymak i\u00e7in de kullan\u0131yorlar.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Bu kavram yan\u0131lg\u0131lar\u0131, genel olarak do\u011fruluk, terbiye ve \u015fehirlilik fikirlerinin egemen oldu\u011fu ve kurallar\u0131n k\u00f6lesi oldu\u011fu bir literat\u00fcre ili\u015fkindir; Restorasyon ve on sekizinci y\u00fczy\u0131l \u015fiirinin ve hatta Virgil, Horace, Ovid ve \u00e7a\u011fda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz bir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 da olu\u015ftururlar.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rogers, “Augustanlar\u0131n Bar\u0131\u015f\u0131” kavram\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131smen kabul ederken, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte sorunsuz bir y\u00fczeyin alt\u0131ndaki co\u015fkunlu\u011fa ve enerjiye dikkat \u00e7ekiyor. Doody, ‘Augustan’ \u015fiirinin \u00fcslup a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok y\u00f6nl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zenginli\u011fini, heyecan\u0131n\u0131 ve tuhafl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 daha macerac\u0131 bir \u015fekilde tam anlam\u0131yla da sergiliyor.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u015eiir ve G\u00f6rsel Sanat Ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 \u015eiir ve g\u00f6rsel sanat aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n ele al\u0131nmas\u0131, do\u011fal olarak d\u00f6nemselle\u015ftirme sorunlar\u0131na, farkl\u0131 disiplinlerin kronolojilerini uzla\u015ft\u0131rma sorunlar\u0131na yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130sko\u00e7 Chaucerians’\u0131 \u0130sko\u00e7 R\u00f6nesans \u015fairleri olarak yeniden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek, saf bir R\u00f6nesans evresini bulmay\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmad\u0131. \u0130ngiltere s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda, bu garip bir \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 da olduk\u00e7a zor oldu. R\u00f6nesans\u0131 kesinlikle \u0130sko\u00e7ya’n\u0131nkinden sonrayd\u0131…
Devam\u0131<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":8622,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19948,19950,19949],"tags":[19953,19951,19955,19956,19954,19952,19957,19958],"class_list":["post-9084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gorsel-siir-ornekleri","category-sanat-ile-ilgili-siirler-kisa","category-sanat-konulu-siirler","tag-gorsel-siir-nedir","tag-gorsel-siir-ornekleri","tag-sanat-ile-ilgili-akrostis","tag-sanat-ile-ilgili-siirler-eodev","tag-sanat-ile-ilgili-siirler-kisa","tag-sanat-konulu-siirler","tag-sanat-siiri-iletisi","tag-siir"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t